The decisive development
A UN-mandated fact-finding mission said it has reasonable grounds to believe that two U.S.
A UN fact-finding mission said two U.S. strikes in Iran likely were war crimes, placing a formal international finding behind a question every military power makes: did its claim of precision survive the evidence?
A UN-mandated fact-finding mission said it has reasonable grounds to believe that two U.S. strikes in Iran on February 28 constituted war crimes. Its findings center on a Minab primary school and a Lamerd sports complex and nearby civilian area. The mission said the school was a clearly identifiable civilian object and found no evidence it was being used for military purposes. The United States has previously said its operations follow the law of armed conflict; CENTCOM denied launching a strike into Lamerd. The finding does not determine criminal liability, but it puts a formal international evidentiary record behind demands for a public U.S. accounting.
A UN fact-finding mission said two U.S. strikes in Iran likely were war crimes, placing a formal international finding behind a question every military power makes: did its claim of precision survive the evidence?
A UN-mandated fact-finding mission said it has reasonable grounds to believe that two U.S.
The central issue is no longer whether the strikes looked terrible, but whether the evidence supports the claims made for them.
The claim of precision has met the test of evidence.
The claim of precision has met the test of evidence.
Primary evidence first. Reporting second. Inference labeled.